Understanding Microphones - Dynamics vs. Condensers
© copyright 2000-2007, DBAR Productions
This content may be downloaded for personal use only, and may not be
reprinted in part or in whole in any form without the express written
consent of Stephen Sherrard and DBAR Productions
Every microphone is different and imparts its own unique sound to
whatever you are recording. There is a very good reason why the
best studios have a very large assortment of microphones.... you simply
need lots of different types of microphones to be able to get the sound
you are looking for. After working with lots of microphones for a
while, you'll quickly learn the sound characteristics of each and will
be able to more accurately choose the right microphone for the job the
next time you are recording something.
The difference between dynamics and condensers really comes down to the
physics of their operation. Without getting into all the boring
physics, A dynamic microphone has a diaphragm that is directly connected
to a core of wire called the "voice coil" that is suspended in
a magnetic field. The movement of the diaphragm causes the voice
coil to move in the magnetic field and thus creates an electrical signal
that's proportional to the acoustical pressure waves from the source
that you are recording. Condenser microphones use electrostatic
properties, and consists of two thin plates, one moveable and one fixed,
that form a capacitor. As the moveable plate moves in relation to
the acoustical pressure waves, the capacitance is changed between the
plates, and the voltage across the plates will change in proportion.
What does all this mean in practical applications? In general,
dynamic microphones have diaphragms of larger mass that take more energy
to move, and that don't respond quite as quickly as the lower mass
diaphragms in condenser microphones. Thus, there are certain sound
characteristics that each design typically shows. Dynamics can
usually handle much sound pressure level than condensers (although
today's condensers can handle much more) and usually work better for
percussive sources (close mic'ing drum kits) or really loud sources
(close mic'ing guitar cabinets). They also work well in live sound
situations because they don't tend to cause feedback problems as much as
condensers do (although a lot of this has to do with the pickup patterns
used and the placement of the mics and the room acoustics). They
are a lot more durable and can handle a lot more abuse than a condenser
microphone as well. Since condenser microphones have much lighter
diaphragms, they typicall react much quicker to incoming signals, and
thus they usually have a much more open and detailed high frequency
response than a dynamic microphone.... since they can react to the high
frequency transients much quicker. This is why condensers are
usually preferred for sources where you want more of that brighter, yet
clear and detailed high frequency sound, such as vocals, acoustic
guitars, piano, drum overheads or room mics, etc. Within the
condenser category, there are large diaphragm condensers and small
diaphragm condenser microphones. As you might expect, the smaller
diaphragm condensers can react even quicker and often have even better
high frequency response, but at the sacrifice of the low end warmth...
the smaller condensers are usually used for acoustic guitars and
overheads/cymbals for drums, because you usually want a lot of high-end
detail with very quick transient response for these types of sources,
and you don't care as much about the low end. Large diaphragm
condensers are usually associated with being warmer and bigger sounding,
and thus are quite popular for vocals or solo instrument work.
Those are very generalized descriptions. There is quite a lot of
variety in each type of microphone, because there is a lot that can be
done to change a microphone's sound in the design stage. Some
microphones are designed to be very flat and neutral sounding, while
others are designed to really emphasize certain frequency ranges.
Also, understanding the types of pickup patterns is very crucial as
well.... These are omni-directional, bi-directional (figure 8), cardioid,
super-cardioid, and hyper-cardiod (and then some special ones that I
won't get into). Basically, you just need to know that some
microphones are omni-directional, meaning that they pick up sound
equally well from all directions, while others are directional ...
meaning that they pick up the most sound from directly in front of the
diaphragm, and reject the most sound from directly behind (most stage
microphones are directional so that they will reject the greatest amount
of sound from directly behind them where the floor monitors are usually
placed, to avoid feedback as much as possible). One of the things
to keep in mind when using any type of cardioid pickup pattern
microphone is what is called the "proximity effect".
When you get within about 6 inches of a directional microphone, you get
a sort of bass boost type of effect due to the close proximity.
This is something to keep in mind when tracking vocals in particular...
sometimes this effect is desirable for certain vocalists, but not
desirable for others. Also, many high end microphones have more
than one diaphragm and will allow you to change the pickup patterns of
the microphone between various directional and non-directional
settings. This can really change the sound of the microphone and
make it much more useful in a wider variety of situations.
Did you find this article helpful? If so, please consider making a support donation with the button below:
| back | top | home |
© copyright 2000-2007, DBAR Productions
This content may be downloaded for personal use only, and may not be
reprinted in part or in whole in any form without the express written
consent of Stephen Sherrard and DBAR Productions
|